+- RunningCommentary.net Forums (http://www.runningcommentary.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Main (http://www.runningcommentary.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Website (http://www.runningcommentary.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: Chris's forum - sad duty (/showthread.php?tid=1721)
Chris's forum - sad duty - El Gordo - 08-09-2009
This is the saddest question I have ever asked here, but can I canvass opinion please on what we should do with Moyleman's forum? The options include:
- Keeping it as it is i.e. a postable, visible forum
- Keeping it visible, but locking it so that no new posts can be added
- Archiving it i.e. removing it from sight but keeping it stored
There are probably other options too.
I need to balance the wish for a 'tribute' against considerations of good taste and respectfulness.
All opinions welcome, though I think I will have to take most notice of those closest to him -- Sweder incuded.
Thanks.
RE: Chris's forum - sad duty - Seafront Plodder - 09-09-2009
I agree and think that Moylebird should decide.
For what it's worth, I think the threads should be left up, but closed to new posts.
RE: Chris's forum - sad duty - Mid Life Crisis Marathon Man - 09-09-2009
I agree with SP... which I think is a first for me.
RE: Chris's forum - sad duty - Sweder - 10-09-2009
Gotta say the Big Man has it right: open to read, but not to post.
Chris would like the idea of loitering in the forums, and I for one love to revisit his old posts with a pint of the black stuff.
It's like he never went away
RE: Chris's forum - sad duty - El Gordo - 10-09-2009
(10-09-2009, 11:30 AM)Sweder Wrote: Gotta say the Big Man has it right: open to read, but not to post.
Chris would like the idea of loitering in the forums, and I for one love to revisit his old posts with a pint of the black stuff.
It's like he never went away
Agree that this seems the best option. I've locked the forum.