Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Legs: to cover or not to cover
24-01-2005, 11:55 PM,
#13
Legs: to cover or not to cover
I recently saw an outdoor jacket described as a "Second Generation Extended Cold Weather Clothing System (2G ECWCS)", which I thought was pretty embarrassing.

Thorlos are splendid. At least, the packaging says they're great, and I believe them. Padded, chunky and satisfying expensive at about a fiver per sock, they are indeed my sock of choice. I bought 3 or 4 pairs nearly 3 years ago, and they're still going strong. Mind you, I wear them only on longer runs, when I need to give myself a treat. Sub 5 or 6 miles and I'm happy with the "4 pairs for £2" bargain bin stuff. I've never tested the theory but I imagine they might produce a few blisters on longer runs.
El Gordo

Great things are done when men and mountains meet.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by Sweder - 24-01-2005, 09:41 AM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by Sweder - 24-01-2005, 10:42 AM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by Sweder - 24-01-2005, 10:45 AM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by Antonio247 - 24-01-2005, 02:37 PM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by Sweder - 24-01-2005, 04:52 PM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by Sweder - 24-01-2005, 11:40 PM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by El Gordo - 24-01-2005, 11:55 PM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by El Gordo - 24-01-2005, 11:57 PM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by Sweder - 25-01-2005, 09:53 AM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by Sweder - 25-01-2005, 10:52 AM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by Nigel - 25-01-2005, 11:27 AM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by El Gordo - 25-01-2005, 01:08 PM
Legs: to cover or not to cover - by Sweder - 25-01-2005, 01:46 PM



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)